Open Access

Interference Excision in Spread Spectrum Communications Using Adaptive Positive Time-Frequency Analysis

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20072007:014916

DOI: 10.1155/2007/14916

Received: 26 July 2006

Accepted: 24 May 2007

Published: 5 July 2007


This paper introduces a novel algorithm to excise single and multicomponent chirp-like interferences in direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) communications. The excision algorithm consists of two stages: adaptive signal decomposition stage and directional element detection stage based on the Hough-Radon transform (HRT). Initially, the received spread spectrum signal is decomposed into its time-frequency (TF) functions using an adaptive signal decomposition algorithm, and the resulting TF functions are mapped onto the TF plane. We then use a line detection algorithm based on the HRT that operates on the image of the TF plane and detects energy varying directional elements that satisfy a parametric constraint. Interference is modeled by reconstructing the corresponding TF functions detected by the HRT, and subtracted from the received signal. The proposed technique has two main advantages: (i) it localizes the interferences on the TF plane with no cross-terms, thus facilitating simple filtering techniques based on thresholding of the TF functions, and is an efficient way to excise the interference; (ii) it can be used for the detection of any directional interferences that can be parameterized. Simulation results with synthetic models have shown successful performance with linear and quadratic chirp interferences for single and multicomponent interference cases. The proposed method excises the interference even under very low SNR conditions of  dB, and the technique could be easily extended to any interferences that could be represented by a parametric equation in the TF plane.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ryerson University


  1. Yang W, Bi G: Adaptive wavelet packet transform-based narrowband interference canceller in DSSS systems. Electronics Letters 1997,33(14):1189-1190. 10.1049/el:19970817View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ranheim A: Narrowband interference rejection in direct-sequence spread-spectrum system using time-frequency decomposition. IEE Proceedings: Communications 1995,142(6):393-400. 10.1049/ip-com:19952299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Poor HV, Wang X: Adaptive suppression of narrowband digital interferers from spread spectrum signals. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '96), May 1996, Atlanta, Ga, USA 2: 1061-1064.Google Scholar
  4. Liu L, Ge H: Time-varying AR modeling and subspace projection for FM jammer suppression in DS/SS-CDMA systems. Proceedings of the 37th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC '03), November 2003, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA 1: 623-627.Google Scholar
  5. Rao KD, Swamy MNS, Plotkin EI: A nonlinear adaptive filter for narrowband interference mitigation in spread spectrum systems. Signal Processing 2005,85(3):625-635. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2004.11.005View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Laster JD, Reed JH: Interference rejection in digital wireless communications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1997,14(3):37-62. 10.1109/79.587051View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen L: Time-frequency distributions-a review. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989,77(7):941-981. 10.1109/5.30749View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Amin MG: Interference mitigation in spread spectrum communication systems using time-frequency distributions. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1997,45(1):90-101. 10.1109/78.552208MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbarossa S, Scaglione A: Adaptive time-varying cancellation of wideband interferences in spread-spectrum communications based on time-frequency distributions. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1999,47(4):957-965. 10.1109/78.752594View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Krongold BS, Kramer ML, Ramchandran K, Jones DL: Spread spectrum interference suppression using adaptive time-frequency tilings. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '97), April 1997, Munich, Germany 3: 1881-1884.Google Scholar
  11. Ouyang X, Amin MG: Short-time Fourier transform receiver for nonstationary interference excision in direct sequence spread spectrum communications. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2001,49(4):851-863. 10.1109/78.912929View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bultan A, Akansu AN: A novel time-frequency exciser in spread spectrum communications for chirp-like interference. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '98), May 1998, Seattle, Wash, USA 6: 3265-3268.Google Scholar
  13. Suleesathira R, Chaparro LF: Jammer excision in spread spectrum using discrete evolutionary-Hough transform and singular value decomposition. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (SSAP '00), August 2000, Pennsylvania, Pa, USA 519-523.Google Scholar
  14. Tazebay MV, Akansu AN: Adaptive subband transforms in time-frequency excisers for DSSS communications systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1995,43(11):2776-2782. 10.1109/78.482125View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Matz G, Hlawatsch F: Time-frequency projection filters: online implementation, subspace tracking, and application to interference excision. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), May 2002, Orlando, Fla, USA 2: 1213-1216.Google Scholar
  16. Amin MG, Mandapati GR: Nonstationary interference excision in spread spectrum communications using projection filtering methods. Proceedings of the 32nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 1998, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA 1: 827-831.Google Scholar
  17. Krishnan S: Adaptive signal processing techniques for analysis of knee joint vibroarthrographic signals, Ph.D. thesis. University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen L, Posch T: Positive time-frequency distribution functions. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1985,33(1):31-38. 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Loughlin PJ, Pitton JW, Atlas LE: Construction of positive time-frequency distributions. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1994,42(10):2697-2705. 10.1109/78.324735View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mallat SG, Zhang Z: Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1993,41(12):3397-3415. 10.1109/78.258082View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Erkucuk S, Krishnan S: Time-frequency filtering of interferences in spread spectrum communications. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications (ISSPA '03), July 2003, Paris, France 2: 323-326.Google Scholar
  22. Rangayyan RM, Krishnan S: Feature identification in the time-frequency plane by using the Hough-Radon transform. Pattern Recognition 2001,34(6):1147-1158. 10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00073-XView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Duda RO, Hart PE: Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Communications of the ACM 1972,15(1):11-15. 10.1145/361237.361242View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Herman GT: Image Reconstruction from Projections. The Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1980.MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu L, Oja E, Kultanen P: A new curve detection method: randomized Hough transform (RHT). Pattern Recognition Letters 1990,11(5):331-338. 10.1016/0167-8655(90)90042-ZView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar


© S. Krishnan and S. Erküçük 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.