Open Access

A Power-Efficient Access Point Operation for Infrastructure Basic Service Set in IEEE 802.11 MAC Protocol

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20062006:063728

DOI: 10.1155/WCN/2006/63728

Received: 19 December 2005

Accepted: 26 May 2006

Published: 19 September 2006

Abstract

Infrastructure-based wireless LAN technology has been widely used in today's personal communication environment. Power efficiency and battery management have been the center of attention in the design of handheld devices with wireless LAN capability. In this paper, a hybrid protocol named improved PCF operation is proposed, which intelligently chooses the access point- (AP-) assisted DCF (distributed coordinator function) and enhanced PCF (point coordinator function) transmission mechanism of IEEE 802.11 protocol in an infrastructure-based wireless LAN environment. Received signal strength indicator (RSSI) is used to determine the tradeoff between direct mobile-to-mobile transmission and transmission routed by AP. Based on the estimation, mobile stations can efficiently communicate directly instead of being routed through AP if they are in the vicinity of each other. Furthermore, a smart AP protocol is proposed as extension to the improved PCF operation by utilizing the historical end-to-end delay information to decide the waking up time of mobile stations. Simulation results show that using the proposed protocol, energy consumption of mobile devices can be reduced at the cost of slightly longer end-to-end packet delay compared to traditional IEEE 802.11 PCF protocol. However, in a non-time-critical environment, this option can significantly prolong the operation time of mobile devices.

[12345678910111213141516171819]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University

References

  1. LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Std 802.11–1999, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications
  2. Stemm M, Katz RH: Measuring and reducing energy consumption of network interfaces in hand-held devices. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications, and Computer Science 1997,E80-B(8):1125–1131.Google Scholar
  3. Feeney LM: An energy consumption model for performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Mobile Networks and Applications 2001,6(3):239–249. 10.1023/A:1011474616255MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ye MH, Lau CT, Premkumar B: A modified power saving mode in IEEE 802.11 distributed coordinator function. Computer Communications 2005,28(10):1214–1224. 10.1016/j.comcom.2004.07.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong XJ, Ergen M, Varaiya P, Puri A: Improving the aggregate throughput of access points in IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '03), October 2003, Bonn/Königswinter, Germany 682–681.Google Scholar
  6. Zhu H, Cao G: On improving the performance of IEEE 802.11 with relay-enabled PCF. Mobile Networks and Applications 2004,9(4):423–434.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Krashinsky R, Balakrishnan H: Minimizing energy for wireless web access with bounded slowdown. Wireless Networks 2005,11(1–2):135–148. 10.1007/s11276-004-4751-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. IEEE 802.11 WG : Draft Supplement to STANDARD FOR Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: Medium Access Control (MAC) Enhancements for Quality of Service (QoS). IEEE Std 802.11e/D4.0, November 2002
  9. Meguerdichian S, Slijepcevic S, Karayan V, Potkonjak M: Localized algorithms in wireless ad-hoc networks: location discovery and sensor exposure. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc '01), October 2001, Long Beach, Calif, USA 106–116.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Youssef MA, Agrawala A, Udaya Shankar A: WLAN location determination via clustering and probability distributions. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom '03), March 2003, Fort Worth, Tex, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Krishnan P, Krishnakumar AS, Ju W-H, Mallows C, Ganu S: A system for LEASE: location estimation assisted by stationary emitters for indoor RF wireless networks. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, March 2004, Hong Kong 2: 1001–1011.Google Scholar
  12. Ramadurai V, Sichitiu ML: Localization in wireless sensor networks: a probabilistic approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN '03), June 2003, Las Vegas, Nev, USA 275–281.Google Scholar
  13. Enge P, Misra P: Special issue on global positioning system. Proceedings of the IEEE 1999,87(1):3–15. 10.1109/JPROC.1999.736338View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J: Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice. 2nd edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Prasithsangaree P, Krishnamurthy P, Chrysanthis PK: On indoor position location with wireless LANs. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '02), September 2002, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  16. Saha S, Chaudhuri K, Sanghi D, Bhagwat P: Location determination of a mobile device using IEEE 802.11b access point signals. Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '03), March 2003, New Orleans, La, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Simunic T, Vikalo H, Glynn P, De Micheli G: Energy efficient design of portable wireless systems. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED '00), July 2000, Rapallo, Italy 49–54.Google Scholar
  18. The CMU Monarch Project : The CMU monarch project's wireless and mobility extensions to NS. http://www.monarch.cs.rice.edu/cmu-ns.html
  19. Lindgren A, Almquist A, Schelén O: Quality of service schemes for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs - an evaluation. Mobile Networks and Applications 2003,8(3):223–235. special issue of the Journal of Special Topics in Mobile Networking and Applications (MONET) on Performance Evaluation of QoS Architectures in Mobile Networks 10.1023/A:1023389530496View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ye Ming Hua et al. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.