Open Access

Decentralized Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks with Channel Fading Statistics

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20062007:062915

DOI: 10.1155/2007/62915

Received: 15 August 2006

Accepted: 19 November 2006

Published: 27 December 2006


Existing channel aware signal processing design for decentralized detection in wireless sensor networks typically assumes the clairvoyant case, that is, global channel state information (CSI) is known at the design stage. In this paper, we consider the distributed detection problem where only the channel fading statistics, instead of the instantaneous CSI, are available to the designer. We investigate the design of local decision rules for the following two cases: (1) fusion center has access to the instantaneous CSI; (2) fusion center does not have access to the instantaneous CSI. As expected, in both cases, the optimal local decision rules that minimize the error probability at the fusion center amount to a likelihood ratio test (LRT). Numerical analysis reveals that the detection performance appears to be more sensitive to the knowledge of CSI at the fusion center. The proposed design framework that utilizes only partial channel knowledge will enable distributed design of a decentralized detection wireless sensor system.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Syracuse University


  1. Radner R: Team decision problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1962,33(3):857-881. 10.1214/aoms/1177704455MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Tenney RR, Sandell NR Jr.: Detection with distributed sensors. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1981,17(4):501-510.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Varshney PK: Distributed Detection and Data Fusion. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Reibman AR, Nolte LW: Optimal detection and performance of distributed sensor systems. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1987,23(1):24-30.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoballah IY, Varshney PK: Distributed Bayesian signal detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1989,35(5):995-1000. 10.1109/18.42208MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomopoulos SCA, Viswanathan R, Bougoulias DK: Optimal distributed decision fusion. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1989,25(5):761-765. 10.1109/7.42092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Tsitsiklis JN: Decentralized detection. In Advances in Statistical Signal Processing. Edited by: Poor HV, Thomas JB. JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn, USA; 1993:297-344.Google Scholar
  8. Duman TM, Salehi M: Decentralized detection over multiple-access channels. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1998,34(2):469-476. 10.1109/7.670328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen B, Willett PK: On the optimality of the likelihood-ratio test for local sensor decision rules in the presence of nonideal channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2005,51(2):693-699. 10.1109/TIT.2004.840879MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu B, Chen B: Channel-optimized quantizers for decentralized detection in sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2006,52(7):3349-3358.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Kashyap A: Comments on "on the optimality of the likelihood-ratio test for local sensor decision rules in the presence of nonideal channels". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2006,52(3):1274-1275.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsitsiklis JN, Athans M: On the complexity of decentralized decision making and detection problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1985,30(5):440-446. 10.1109/TAC.1985.1103988MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Willett PK, Swaszek PF, Blum RS: The good, bad, and ugly: distributed detection of a known signal in dependent gaussian noise. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2000,48(12):3266-3279. 10.1109/78.886990MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen B, Jiang R, Kasetkasem T, Varshney PK: Fusion of decisions transmitted over fading channels in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 36th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 2002, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA 2: 1184-1188.Google Scholar
  15. Niu R, Chen B, Varshney PK: Decision fusion rules in wireless sensor networks using fading channel statistics. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS '03), March 2003, Baltimore, Md, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsitsiklis JN: Extremal properties of likelihood-ratio quantizers. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1993,41(4):550-558. 10.1109/26.223779View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar


© B. Liu and B. Chen. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.